LOADING

Type to search

“Where’s The Police When You Need Them”: D.C. Delegate Asks The Right Question After Bizarre Incident Near White House

Share

Authored by Jonathan Turley,

NBC correspondent Andrea Mitchell and Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.) had a bizarre encounter yesterday when a man dressed only in a bra and panties rushed then near Black Lives Matter Square and the area claimed earlier as the “Black House Autonomous Zone.”

Mitchell immediately asked “where’s the police” and Norton added “where’s the police when you need them?” It is a question that many of us have been asking D.C. officials for weeks as police have stood by and watched statues destroyed and defaced around the city.

This week, D.C. Chief of Police Peter Newsham stated that his department has made the “tactical decision” not to intervene as certain statues have been torn down in front of them. I have been highly critical of both this destruction and the failure of D.C. officials to act, including the iconic bust of George Washington on my own campus at George Washington University.

Thankfully no one was injured in this encounter:

The answer to the question however is equally troubling. Police are often around when violence and destruction occurs in these protests.

The question came up when reporters asked Newsham why officers stood around as mere pedestrians on Friday night as a mob pulled down the statue of Albert Pike in Judiciary Square. There have been good-faith calls for the removal of the statue, including by Norton.  I have participated in this debate for years on determining what public art should be removed and what standards we should apply to the preservation of historical monuments, including a discussion organized by the Smithsonian Institution a few years back.  Some monuments should be removed but this should be done with the consent and deliberation of the communities.  Indeed, such acts hold greater meaning when done through legitimate and consensual means.  This is not part of that debate, this is destruction by mobs who unilaterally determine what public art will be allowed and what will be destroyed.

After a mob was allowed to attach ropes and work to pull down the statue of Andrew Jackson, there was a belated response from federal and district officers. The statue however was defaced and was only saved from toppling by its sheer size.  Media reported that Mayor Muriel Bowser and her office declined any comment on the mob scene that was scene on every network. That was what one might call a “tactical political decision.”

The “tactical decision” made by the Newsham is a convenient and widely used approach around the country.  Leaders are allowing art to be destroyed rather than confront these mobs — not on the inherent value of the monuments but the right of society to make such decisions as a whole.  This is nothing new. Such tactical decisions have been made by universities for years as they watched their art destroyed without any action or discipline.  At the same time, police have been ordered to give mobs free range in destroying public art.  Even when arrests are made, prosecutors have dropped charges under pressure from the public. 

This same tactical decision has been made in other cities by leaders.  Just yesterday, a legislator was attacked and sent to the hospital for taking a picture of the destruction. Both journalists and pedestrians have also been attacked for filming such scenes by protesters. Democratic senator Tim Carpenter told the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel that he was beaten after taking a photo last night as two statues being toppled.

The protesters tore down the statue of Col. Christian Heg, who fought and died during the Civil War on the Union side

As noted earlier, the spectrum of action from cities and universities seems to range from deafening silence to cringing compliance in the face of such destruction.  At the University of Oregon, famous statues of the Pioneer and Mother Pioneer were torn down. The University condemned the destruction and then promptly promised that the statues would be carted away and not returned.

Thus, the answer to D.C. Delegate Norton’s question is that the police is often present, but remain mere pedestrians by design.  Call it “tactical” or consensual, but destruction of public art and historical monuments is occurring with the acquiescence of the city leaders.

via zerohedge

7 Comments

  1. Dan Miller June 25, 2020

    This DC delegate to Congress wants Washington DC to become a state hum ? If she has to wonder where the police are when the city has ” home rule” government she only needs to ask the mayor and the police ” chief ” where are they. Remember the old TV show ” Car 54 Where Are You “

    Reply
  2. Texas Tea Partier June 25, 2020

    Looks like it is past time for the fire hoses and rubber bullets!

    Reply
  3. T Beach June 25, 2020

    Fresh out of rubber bullets. They must come from China. Guess they will have to settle for the real thing this time lol

    Reply
  4. Ken June 25, 2020

    Where is police when you need them? Here it is stupid clue DEFUND THE POLICE!!!!

    Reply
  5. The Redhawk June 25, 2020

    WHERE…..INDEED!!! But how mnay of thse AS SHOLES will vote for mORE dERANGED MORONS TO RUN THEIR SATES AND CITIES into ANARCHY LOCATIONS???

    Reply
    1. Boaz June 25, 2020

      You can’t fix brainwashed brains! All these cities where the problems are, are Liberal cities, lead by liberal mayors, liberal councils and in most case the state is the same way, yet the people wanting change live in these cities and still vote for the liberals time and time again. been this way for many years. They get whatnthe deserve! Ignorance abound!.

      Reply
  6. paul s June 26, 2020

    Tim Carpenter posted ” Can we stop the violence please ” after getting beat up . Yeah ,that’s going to stop them .

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *